unfoldingWord® Literal Text (formerly ULB) https://www.unfoldingword.org/ult
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
Larry Sallee f7f39fd421 Corrected Luke format (#2506) 15 hours ago
.github Prepare to publish v21 (#2419) 4 months ago
.gitattributes Add .gitattributes to normalize line endings 4 years ago
.gitignore Create .gitignore 5 years ago
01-GEN.usfm Fix an \s5 marker (#2305) 8 months ago
02-EXO.usfm exo 16 review w/ twl (#2503) 2 days ago
03-LEV.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
04-NUM.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
05-DEU.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
06-JOS.usfm Minor edits to Joshua (#2050) 2 years ago
07-JDG.usfm Removed double spaces from Judges (#2052) 2 years ago
08-RUT.usfm Small syntax fixes for BPs for v17 (#2348) 6 months ago
09-1SA.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
10-2SA.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
11-1KI.usfm Align and edit Joshua, add curly quotes to 1 Kings (#2044) 2 years ago
12-2KI.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
13-1CH.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
14-2CH.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
15-EZR.usfm Prepare to publish v22 (#2426) 4 months ago
16-NEH.usfm Tidy quotes (#2357) 6 months ago
17-EST.usfm Prepare to publish v26 (#2499) 3 days ago
18-JOB.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
19-PSA.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
20-PRO.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
21-ECC.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
22-SNG.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
23-ISA.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
24-JER.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
25-LAM.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
26-EZK.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
27-DAN.usfm Insert "fathers" in DAN 9:6 (#2271) 9 months ago
28-HOS.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
29-JOL.usfm Correct alignment of construct forms (#2042) 2 years ago
30-AMO.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
31-OBA.usfm Syntax fixes plus prepare v23 for publication (#2451) 2 months ago
32-JON.usfm Small syntax fixes for BPs for v17 (#2348) 6 months ago
33-MIC.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
34-NAM.usfm Aligned and edited Nahum (#2048) 2 years ago
35-HAB.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
36-ZEP.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
37-HAG.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
38-ZEC.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
39-MAL.usfm Prepare for publishing version 11 (#2185) 1 year ago
41-MAT.usfm Edits to Matthew during TW check (#2476) 2 months ago
42-MRK.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
43-LUK.usfm Corrected Luke format (#2506) 15 hours ago
44-JHN.usfm Edits to John during TW check (#2489) 4 weeks ago
45-ACT.usfm Edits to Acts during TN snippet update (#2496) 7 days ago
46-ROM.usfm Edited Romans 1-4 for BP. (#2490) 2 weeks ago
47-1CO.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
48-2CO.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
49-GAL.usfm Updated Galatians for BP (#2414) 4 months ago
50-EPH.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
51-PHP.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
52-COL.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
53-1TH.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
54-2TH.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
55-1TI.usfm Corrections to Titus and 1 Timothy from ULT Issue queue (#2395) 5 months ago
56-2TI.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
57-TIT.usfm Removed incorrect "our" in Titus 1:4 (#2464) 2 months ago
58-PHM.usfm Edits to Philemon for BP (#2422) 4 months ago
59-HEB.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
60-JAS.usfm Chris' edits to James (#2502) 2 days ago
61-1PE.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
62-2PE.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
63-1JN.usfm Corrected "eternal" wording in 1 John (#2474) 2 months ago
64-2JN.usfm Corrected word in 2 John 1:9 (#2452) 2 months ago
65-3JN.usfm Fixed stray grammatical issues in 3 John (#2442) 3 months ago
66-JUD.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
67-REV.usfm Fixed spacing of footnote callers in NT. (#2466) 2 months ago
LICENSE.md Syntax fixes plus prepare v23 for publication (#2451) 2 months ago
README.md Update 'README.md' (#2486) 4 weeks ago
manifest.yaml Valid Prepare to publish v26 (#2499) 3 days ago
media.yaml Link updates (#1792) 3 years ago

README.md

drawing

unfoldingWord® Literal Text - English

an unrestricted literal version of the Bible intended for translation into any language as a tool for use by Bible translators

Overview

The ULT began as an open-licensed adaptation of The American Standard Version. It has since undergone a careful comparison to the original biblical languages, using the best tools that are available to modern scholarship, and made to reflect the forms of those languages as far as English grammar and understanding will allow. The ULT is thus intended to provide a ‘form-centric’ rendering of the biblical text from the original biblical languages (Biblical Hebrew, Biblical Aramaic, and Koiné Greek) into English. This increases a translator’s understanding of the lexical and grammatical composition of the biblical text by adhering closely to the grammatical (i.e. parts of speech) and syntactic (i.e. word order) stuctures of the original languages. For translators who do not speak English, we intend to translate the ULT into the other major languages of the world.

Viewing

To read or print the ULT, see the ULT project on Door43.

Contributors

If you are a contributor to this project please add your name to the contributor field in the manifest.yaml file.

Introducing the ULT

The ULT (unfoldingWord® Literal Text) is a form-centric (and thus “literal”) version of the Bible in English. It is intended to be used alongside the UST (unfoldingWord® Simplified Text) and other translation resources to give English-speaking mother-tongue translators (MTTs) a more complete understanding of the messages communicated in the Bible. The purpose of the ULT text is to allow a Bible translator who does not have reading knowledge of the original biblical languages (Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek) to “see” the grammatical forms of those languages. Therefore, the goal of the ULT text as a translation resource is to copy the Original Language (OrigL) form as much as possible yet still be understandable in English or other Gateway Language (GL). For MTTs who cannot read the OrigL text, the ULT provides a sense of how these messages of the Bible were communicated in the OrigL. It is anticipated that the ULT and other resources will be translated from English into the world’s GLs so that MTTs worldwide can use them as a set of resources for making accurate translations of the Bible into their own languages.

The ULT stands in the range of literalness somewhere between a very literally translated user Bible (such as the New American Standard Bible [NASB]) and an English interlinear text. An English interlinear text is designed to render OrigL words into their individual and basic (“literal”) English meanings without regard to understandability of the overall English text. On the other hand, a very literally translated user Bible tries to adhere as closely as possible to the OrigL but must sometimes compromise in favor of English idiom and expression in order for the text to be both grammatically correct and readily understood. The ULT negotiates a path between these two kinds of texts. For example, the ULT reproduces the OrigL idioms even when they are not English idioms, relying on a translation note to explain the meaning. In that way, the translator can see the original expression, and also the meaning. The ULT does not substitute English idioms or expressions. However, if an OrigL grammatical form would give the wrong meaning or no meaning at all, the ULT will use the English form in that case so that the ULT can also meet the demand of reasonable understandability in English.

Editing or Translating the ULT

The unfoldingWord® Literal Text (ULT) is designed to be used as a tool for Bible translation in conjunction with the unfoldingWord® Simplified Text (UST), the unfoldingWord® Translation Words (UTW), and the unfoldingWord® Translation Notes (UTN). It is not an end-user Bible, which seeks to transform all of the structures of the original biblical languages into those that are natural and idiomatic in the target language. Instead, unlike the UST and unlike an end-user Bible, the ULT is designed to reflect the forms of the source languages, so that the MTT can see what they are. By using the ULT, the MTT can “look through” it to see how the original Bible expressed the biblical ideas.

Retain Original Forms and Structures

Therefore, as you (an editor or translator of the ULT) edit or translate the ULT, you must retain the grammatical and syntactic structures of the original as much as the target language (English or other Gateway Language) will reasonably allow. If the original structure is ungrammatical in the target language, then you will need to change it into a structure that is grammatical in the target language. It does no good to make a translation that a MTT using this tool cannot understand. But as much as the target language will allow, retain the structures of the original while editing or translating the ULT. For English, it is often possible to retain nouns as nouns, verbs as verbs, etc., but their order in the original sentence must be changed.

In addition to the grammatical forms, the ULT must also retain the idioms and the figures of speech found in the original languages so that the MTT can consider them and use them if they communicate the right thing in his target language (i.e. a minority or Other Language [OL], not Gateway Language). If these aspects of the original language text are changed in the English version (or other Gateway Language translation) of the ULT, then the OL translator will never see them. Furthermore, their accompanying explanations (found in the unfoldingWord® Translation Notes) will not make sense.

The ULT and the UST are designed to be complementary tools for use by an OL translator. These tools should be as useful as possible, which means that the ULT should retain original language structures that would not always be retained in an end-user Bible. Therefore, you must understand that the ULT will often lack naturalness (and sometimes also lack clarity) because it aims to reproduce the original language structures and figures of speech that the GL may not normally use. However, in places where the ULT lacks clarity, there will be BOTH a Translation Note to explain the meaning of the structure for the OL translator AND a clear rendering of the original meaning in the UST. Together, the UTN and the UST will provide the meaning of the text wherever that meaning is in doubt in the ULT. In this way, the various tools work together to provide an OL translator with more complete information about both the form and the meaning of the biblical text as written in the original languages.

One specific way in which the ULT and UST are complementary tools concerns the selection of meaning in the original language texts. There are many instances in the biblical text where the meaning of a word or phrase in the original languages is ambiguous. In those cases, the ULT should retain the ambiguity of meaning, if possible. In contrast, the UST should select the most probable meaning and express that meaning according to its own translation method. NOTE: It is acceptable for the ULT to select meaning in cases where the meaning of the original language is linguistically ambiguous but seems clear from the context.

Examples

For examples see the Examples portion of the Gateway Language Manual.

The ULT Contrasted with the UST

See the The ULT Contrasted with the UST in the Gateway Language Manual.

Editing the ULT

See Specific Editing Guidelines for the ULT in the Gateway Language Manual.

Translating the ULT from the Original Language (OrigL)

Translation of Terms Regarding Gender

Both Biblical Hebrew and Koiné Greek utilize different word forms to indicate grammatical gender, which may or may not correspond either to the actual gender of a person or to the lack of gender in an object. For example, the Hebrew phrase beney yisrael (“sons of Israel”) sometimes literally means “male children of the man named Israel” (Gen 42:5). However, most of the time in the Old Testament this phrase refers figuratively to the entire Israelite nation as a whole, both men and women. In a similar way, the Greek term adelphoi (“brothers”) can sometimes literally mean “a male person who has the same father and/or mother” (Mark 3:22), but most of the time in the New Testament refers figuratively to Christian believers, both men and women. This linguistic feature of “engendered language” poses significant problems for translation. The meaning of the original Hebrew/Aramaic/Greek text is not always clear; also, some languages do not use engendered language, which makes the translation of gender very difficult.

The ULT should retain the engendered language of Hebrew/Aramaic/Greek terms as much as possible. However, a notable exception to this rule concerns the translation of masculine participles (that is, verbal nouns and/or verbal adjectives) which actually refer to both men and women together; those terms can be translated without specifying gender.

Translation Glossary for the ULT

See the Combined ULT-UST Translation Glossary in the Gateway Language Manual.

Translation Glossary for the Old Testament

See the Translation Glossary for the Old Testament in the Gateway Language Manual.

Translation Glossary for the New Testament

See the Translation Glossary for the New Testament in the Gateway Language Manual.

Notes About Making a “Literal” Translation

See the Notes About Making a “Literal” Translation section in the Gateway Language Manual.

Aligning the ULT

In the tC (translationCore) Word Alignment tool, the English chapters and verses are listed down the left side. When you click on a verse to open it, the words of that verse appear in a vertical list, ordered from top to bottom, just to the right of the list of chapters and verses. Each word is in a separate box.

The words of the OrigL (Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek) text for that verse are also in separate boxes in a field to the right of the English word list. There is a space under each of the source word boxes outlined with a dotted line.

Alignment Process for the ULT

To align the English text:

  • Click and drag each word box of the English text into the space under the word box of the OrigL text to which the English word corresponds.
  • Drop the English word by releasing the mouse button.

When the English word is over a word box of the OrigL, the dotted outline will turn blue to let you know that the word will drop there. If you make a mistake, or if you decide that the English word belongs somewhere else, simply drag it again to where it belongs. English words can also be dragged back to the list.

When the same English word occurs more than once in a verse, each instance of the word will have a small superscript number after it. This number will help you to align each repeated English word to the correct original word in the correct order. When aligning, check to ensure that these numbered words are in their proper places, since it is easy to miss the numbers and align repeated words incorrectly.

Process to Merge and Unmerge Original Language Words

translationCore supports one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one, and many-to-many alignments. That means that one or more English words can be aligned to one or more OrigL words, as necessary to get the most accurate alignment of the meaning conveyed by the two languages.

  • To align multiple English words to a single OrigL word, simply drag and drop the English words onto the box below the desired OrigL word.
  • When it is desired to align English word(s) to a combination of OrigL words, first drag one of the combination of OrigL words into the same box as the other OrigL word. Multiple OrigL words can be merged together in this fashion.
  • To unmerge previously merged OrigL words, perform the following steps. For Hebrew, drag the leftmost OrigL word slightly to the left. A small new alignment box will appear, and the unmerged word can be dropped into that box. For Greek, drag the rightmost OrigL word slightly to the right. A small new alignment box will appear, and the unmerged word can be dropped into that box. In both cases, any English words that were aligned with that OrigL word return to the word list.
  • The OrigL words should remain in the proper order. If the merge contains 3 or more OrigL words, unmerge either the leftmost or rightmost OrigL word first. Un-merging the center word(s) first may result in the OrigL words becoming out of order. If that happens, unmerge the remaining words in that box to properly return the OrigL words to their original order.

Alignment Philosophy for the ULT

Because English has different requirements for sentence structure and the amount of explicit information that must be provided, there is often not a one-to-one correspondence between an OrigL word and an English word. In these cases, the English words that are provided should be aligned with the OrigL word that implies them.

When aligning an English translation to the OrigL text, the precision of the alignment between the two languages is the highest priority. The most important function of the aligned text is to show the ULT user as specifically as possible from which word in the OrigL text the English meaning is derived. In practice, this means that OrigL words should be merged together ONLY when absolutely necessary for the accuracy of the alignment. Otherwise, OrigL words should not be merged together. In other words, the aligning should be done so that the smallest number of English words are aligned to the smallest number of OrigL words that accurately represent their shared meaning.

For English, we follow these principles, but other GL’s may need a different list to support full alignment.

  • Align indefinite articles to their “head word.” For example, both “a” and “servant” should align to doulos in Titus 1:1.
  • Definite articles that English supplies should also be aligned to their “head word.” For example, both “the” and “faith” should align to pistin in Titus 1:1.
  • Original language definite articles that English does not use should be combined with their original language head word, if possible. For example, ton and logon need to be combined, then “word” aligned with that combination in Titus 1:3. If the article and head word are separated by other words and cannot be combined, and English does not have an article in that place, then leave the OrigL article unaligned.
  • Implicit verbs in the OrigL that are translated explicitly in the target language should be aligned with the predicate. For example, “he should be” that is supplied in English should be aligned to philoxenon along with “hospitable” in Titus 1:8.
  • Words with apostrophes will be split and show up as two words in the word panel. This allows for proper alignment of the two parts of meaning. In most cases in English these are used to represent possession and will be aligned to a single OrigL word in the genitive case. For example, both “God” and “s” will align to theou in Titus 1:1.
  • Often the OrigL and English part of speech won’t match. That is inevitable. Often an original language word will be translated as a English phrase. For example, the three words “does not lie” in English all align with the single word apseudes in Titus 1:2.
  • Sometimes particles in the OrigL are not translated in English. These should be aligned to make the alignment between the OrigL and the English as precise as possible. For example, in most cases the Hebrew direct object marker should be merged with the Hebrew direct object and aligned with that translated word in English. However, in cases where the direct object marker has a conjunction prefix that must be translated in English, then the Hebrew word containing the conjunction and direct object marker should be aligned with the translated conjunction in English.
  • When aligning verbal negations, align any English helping verbs with the OrigL verb. Only align the English term(s) of negation with the negative particle in the OrigL.
  • For relative clauses where English adds a “to be” verb, the verb should be aligned with the predicate if possible, especially if the predicate is a prepositional phrase. Sometimes the predicate is a compound, in which case the added “to be” verb should be aligned with the applicable OrigL relative pronoun/particle.
  • Sometimes English uses a preposition to render the case of a Greek noun or adjective. When Greek has both an adjective and a noun in the same case (such as “good works” in the genitive) the English preposition normally precedes the phrase (“of good works”). However, the English preposition “of” should be aligned to the Greek noun as the head of phase, rather than to the adjective.

Other alignment issues pertinent to Biblical Hebrew include the following:

  • When an infinitive absolute is paired with a finite verb, the infinitive absolute should be aligned separately, if possible. Usually, the infinitive absolute will be translated as an adverb, and it should be aligned with the adverb.
  • As a general rule, the ULT should translate the conjunction in Hebrew verbal forms. The translated conjunction should then be aligned with that Hebrew verb.
  • When aligning construct phrases in Hebrew, the English word “of” should be aligned to the Hebrew construct noun, and any English definite articles should be aligned with the English term it modifies. This may not always reflect the most precise alignment of meaning between Hebrew and English in regard to definiteness, but it keeps the alignment simple and more understandable for the English user.
  • When aligning a verbless clause in Hebrew, the supplied “to be” verb should usually be aligned with the predicate instead of the subject. An exception to this rule occurs when the subject is a demonstrative pronoun (or carries some sort of deictic function). In those cases, the supplied “to be” verb should be aligned with the subject of the verbless clause.
  • Sometimes a verb in Hebrew requires an accompanying preposition that is not required in English, or vice versa. In these cases, align with whichever part of speech fits best on a case-by-case basis. For example, take the phrase “...to pay on our fields...” in Nehemiah 14:4 in the UST. The English preposition “on” fits better semantically with the noun (“on our fields”) rather than with the infinitive (“to pay on”). However, the reverse is true in v.15 in the phrase “...even their servants oppressed the people...” (Heb. שׁלטוּ על־העמ). In this case, the Hebrew שׁלט requires an accompanying preposition, and the concept is already incorporated into the English translation of the verb itself, “oppressed.” So in this case, it is best to merge the Hebrew verb and preposition together, then align both with the English “oppressed.”

You should expect that sometimes you must align words/phrases in English with words in the OrigL that differ in the number of words, order of words, and/or parts of speech (as described above). However, you should ALWAYS align the English words to the OrigL words whose meaning they express, in whatever combination is necessary to produce the most accurate alignment of the meaning.

After aligning a verse, there may be words in the English text that are left over and seem to be extra. If those words are truly necessary for the English text to make sense, then find the OrigL word(s) that they help to express and align them there. But if those words do not express a meaning found in the OrigL text, then it may be that those words should be deleted from the English translation.

Sometimes, in the process of aligning a verse, you will find:

  • An OrigL word that is not represented in the English translation.
  • A mistake in the English translation.
  • Words in the English translation that do not represent anything in the OrigL text.
  • A better or more literal way to express something in the English translation.

For the above cases: if you are an authorized editor, you will want to edit the English translation so that it is more accurate to the OrigL. Otherwise, contact the Englishg translation team to let them know about the issue.

If you notice places where the ULT (unfoldingWord Literal Text) is wrong or potentially wrong, create an issue for it at https://git.door43.org/unfoldingWord/en_ult/issues so we can address it in the next release. In the meantime, align the text as well as possible.

Words Not Found in the Original Language

In the process of alignment according to the instructions above, you may find that the English text has words or phrases that do not represent any meaning in the OrigL text and are not there because the English sentence needs them to make sense. If this occurs, follow these recommendations:

  • If possible, consider editing the English text to match the OrigL text.
  • You may consult other Greek or Hebrew manuscripts to see if there is textual support for your translation (see the Biblical Humanities Dashboard <http://biblicalhumanities.org/dashboard/> for other manuscripts).
  • If you find support for your translation, make sure to include a comment or note about where you found it and why the translation should include it.
  • You should consider placing these English words in brackets or in a footnote.